Sunday, June 28, 2009

On Individualism in 21st Century American Progressive

Death of Individualism? (Worst Scenario: Individualism vs. Non-individualism)

So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.

The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.

During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.

The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.

The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.

Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?

However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.

The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.

This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?

An Opinion on Mormonism

A shrewd note from a writer who can't un-think.

What is Mormonism, really? Does it deserve a stand on one of Christian branches? I do not believe so. It is more of semi-Judaic Christian; much like Seven Days Adventist. Only that Mormonism is the worst Judaic-Christian branch of all. Not only did it offer men to selfishly pursue the Old Jewish days (and some Muslims in case) of polygamy, also to rewrite the American history itself under the presumed story of Moses.

It is probably unfair for me to to say that, as some Mormons might say that they are reformed today and more Christian-like. I would like to refute that one. It is one of fastest organization in the world; one that may have to do with the Zionist organization. The original Zionist organization that deal with trafficking people, which are visible from Utah to north into Canada. That began in 19th century; and the Jewish International funds began some forty years after the death of Joseph.

Is there some coincidence in the connection? Possibly very much so. I would hate to associate myself with Jewish or Muslim synagogue; the same goes for a Mormon church. I consider religion as more of Jewish than Christian one, not because of its reaffirmation of Old Testament in North America; also its close association with Zionist organization and international expansion. A Mormon would say, it happened a hundred years ago.

Although I am unsure as whether how the Mormon church receive its own funds from the state of Utah and surrounding areas all the way to north, possibly to Idaho. New church means that the very system of organization would have to be started anew from beginning of 1830s and forth on. Yet after the American Civil War, Zionist organization seemed to be in a parallel growth to Mormonism in the backyard of North America.

I do not consider that enough a transformation of transparency from Judaic associations to Christianity. The perversity of Mormons are two thousands and three decades too late. There was no need to alienate the New World into wars.

I do not intend to be a racist from Lutheran and/or Catholic point of view. I intend try to make a sense out of Mormonism and Zionist movements in a connection to international funds that robbed the monetary system out of German-Russian economies in the first place (although that is debatable on a case of post-WWI treaty as co-signed through the big three). On a second thought, Confederate states seemed to be in the same process during the Civil War period. Slavery trade, of course, is one of reasons. What about the slavery of Mormonism and Zionist movements? Does they count? How did subsidiaries play in the role of Zionist and/or Mormon movements during all those periods from pre-Civil War to post WWI periods? Perhaps I don't need to know. All I know is that I'm thankful that I am not a Mormon.

Of course, there is much more than just a background noise of microwave radiation somewhere out there in the parallel universe of religiosity. This is only an attempt to fit a picture of what happened in the backyard and how sub-histories might have played some roles. It is more of a question on outer shell, rather than the insider shell of history.

A quick derivative note: Mormon? More money, more women, move on? Hmph.

Is American Democracy Swaying Towards Fascism or Communism?


A Rigid Scientific Approach to Reduce Undesired Diseases, Mutations, or the Likes (A Satire Interview with Dr. Erlich and his team)

It is well known that Russian and Germans contributed much to scientific research in World War II. Naturally, Americans back then are just "not as scientific as Europe" in general on mass scale. Medical experiments, information, and information gatherings were well known throughout the fascism in Europe.

There is a recent, latest proposal on DNA Sudoku in genotyping.

Eldridge: How does this work?

Dr. Erlich: It is very much similar to Sudoku number. We divide the blocks into sequences for A,T,G,C pool to determine the mutation factors in diseases among Jewish community, such as cystic fibrosis, from medical records.


Eldridge: Wait, wait. Slow down. Are we going to purge those people and other ethnicities on American lands.

Dr. Erlich: No. We collect samples, and test the mutation factor on DNA Sudoku.


Eldridge: Let me get this straight. May I proceed?

Dr. Erlich: Yes.


Eldridge: You're attempting to genotype each individual for a purpose of genome sequencing.

Dr. Erlich: Yes. You see, we want to eliminate diseases and undesired genes.


Eldridge: That is a logic approach, I suppose. What did Hannon mean by overcome the sequencing limitation?

Dr. Erlich: Detect and deter the mutations that cause genetic mutations.



Eldridge: In another word, cancers.

Dr. Erlich: That is one of examples.


Eldridge: Sex is a disease.

Dr. Erlich: No, that *clear throats*. No, that is an exchange of gray matters.


Eldridge: There is supposedly a "fifth" DNA sequence. A brain allele that is supposedly of higher DNA order of some kind. How does that fit in DNA Sudoku picture?

Dr. Erlich: That is undermined by gender factor.


Eldridge: What about left-handed? Right-handed? From what I know, left-handed is more prone to diseases and influenza. Otherwise, everything else is just a psychology.

Dr. Erlich: In some cases, yes. There are both benefits to both side. With DNA Sudoku, we can also multiplex and mix samples, or make a hundred of sequences from a sample.


Eldridge: So how do you identity an individual?

Dr. Erlich: We use bar codes.


Eldridge: What about insurance companies?

Dr. Erlich: That is confidential business information.


Eldridge: Wait, wait. Don't let me stop you there. So you are deciding whether if patient's economics is to be determined by his or her genetic information. Bad DNA, and that patient's life is alienated by poverty. Good DNA heritage, that patient's life won't be picking up a phone from any medical insurance company.

Dr. Erlich: I assure you, there is nothing to be concerned about. With DNA Sudoku, the costs can save us millions of dollars.


Eldridge: .....Millions of taxpayer dollars? To insurance companies or larger bio-informatics corporations? Intel corporation, maybe? Devour the money lives out of Americans?

Dr. Erlich: I can't say that. It is a business policy for me to-


Eldridge: Cut the bull. Ok, so I don't want to lose you in an argument. Just how efficiency is this DNA Sudoku?

Dr. Erlich: Once technical and methods are improved, over time we would be able to apply more wider applications.


Eldridge: Ok, I'm trying to think. There are bad and good mutations. How do you make a perfect human being with good mutations from education of bad mutations? Suppose I skip the Nazi block to add an extra column and row. That central, corner cell could turn a human into bad, malformation experiment. Otherwise, we leave the research intact, and Humans will probably be a little advanced 1,000 years later.

Dr. Erlich: I assure you, diseases can be eliminated.


Eldridge: Suppose someday you eliminate a mutation that happen to eliminate the penis organ itself. Or nipples from human males.

Dr. Erlich: I'm pretty sure that penis is not a result of mutation. It is everywhere in animal kingdom.


Eldridge: Eh, you have a point there. What about the differences in mutations between our close chimp cousins and present Humans? Or Perhaps between Neanderthals and Neo-Humans?

Dr. Erlich: That certainly can be compared.


Eldridge: That's my problem, really. When you mix the sequences in the Nazi Sudoku cell block, how do you know which indicator colors to turn off? And switch on? Maybe switch one could lead to more mutations, regardless of on or off. I mean, you can just pretend to move a block in any Nazi cell one row further or a column further, and dismiss previous one, to sequence a disease. An insect work. You could be making thousands of new diseases. How can someone deal with that?

Dr. Erlich: Information Technology department handles the genome information.


Eldridge: Wait, IT? Does that mean- Ok, never mind, so I don't want to get there. We still don't know what happened to Michael Jackson. Is there any way can you collaborate on the story of Michael Jackson's death and latest news of DNA Sudoku approach next day? Suppose you do get DNA Sudoku run smoothly on the marketplace, are you the ultimate god over any patient's life with DNA information?

Dr. Erlich: No, I try to decide what is the best for patients.


Eldridge: Profits from deaths?

Dr. Erlich: No, look, I am a trained professional-


Eldridge: Cut the crap. I'm moving on fast. Where did this idea come from?

Dr. Erlich: A 2,000 years old Chinese cryptology-


Eldridge: Wait. Cryptology? This is ridiculous. DNA Sudoku based on a 2,000 years old math theorem? Are you insane? Them Chinese people are clueless. They can't tell a poison from cure. They even used the Latin and ancient Greek for scientific names.

Dr. Erlich: *voice raising* Look, I think this interview is over. Goodbye.


Eldridge: There are other stuff you didn't answer directly-

*dialed up*


TTY OPERATOR F 9615493: Another call QQ


Eldridge: No, thank you. SK SK.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

A Preview of "Twelve Blunt Talks", A Zigzagged Note

12. You're talking to a Kaiser DNA.

11. I asked the prince yesteryear, "what is the assassin up to?" He raised his both hands and shake head. "I don't know." Prior to that, Tareq the spirit walked in.

10. Why not kill Californian debts off with robots? We would be secured border to border eventually. Let them nuke San Francisco.

9. You know how to blind youths? Make them stare at sun two hours daily. They will either go blind, or eventually get glasses.

8. I got my latest subscription of Scientific American issue the day AFTER the release of T-4 movie. From my understanding, the latest reports are so dim and hell.

7. So, my middle name has its original meaning. There was a secret Nazi deaf community: operational newspaper codenamed REDGE. That person died at the hands of Japanese secret police, at specifically chosen date: November 7, 1944, 27 years after Communist-turned Nazi revolution. That has horrified both Fatherland and Motherland for years, so much that Russia has decided to name a Moscow street after him two decades later. Miyake Hanako the girlfriend has devoted to him since then. His name was Richard Sorge, the Ford-Opel Nazi. Controversially, it is this reason that Ian Fleming based his character on James Bond. Most likely, he was a deaf German.

6. The driver of day said: "When I lived in Florida, this old guy made and install hydrogen kits like that for $300." In defensive response, "all this tell me that computer decide whether if we die engineered by pre-arranged vaccines to varying statistics."

5. I once said, "I don't think Jesus walked on water. He invented the stone-stepping throw that ended up in Hawaii, the cornerstone that were thrown down to Galapagos. See Zeus, and see a bolt of electric lighting-God Thor that began in 10,000 B.C.E., otherwise known as I.C.E.R. (I see emergency room).

A prince of Ghana empire looks nervous. "I mean in the difference between comparative-translator of Greek and nature-like translator out of Hebraic language," I tried to be reflective.

4. Liberal taxes? Screw California. Ka spirit is scary Japanese word for spirit, no? Bobby Jindal? No, thank you. I would rather elect a governor that was here since the days of Civil War of at least four or seven generations.

3. Are Rafi and Sheik Jews? I see tax of 88 cents. Don't you love it when someone fooled politicians so bad, that they play the blame game?

2. "I ain't sure if Sheik or Rafi put some erection medicines in the soup," I said to the prince. Then I realize that I was reading about evolution of cats article, when I brought hot soup over (Scientific American, June issue).

1. What's difference between bankers and lawyers? Let's kill them.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Random Jokes

10. Maybe I could them to a secret death prison, if they misbehavior (on retards and down syndrome). It saves social security number and money.

9. You know the American sign language for Taipei? It is much like talking bird.

8. Perhaps that's where they come from, the lands of Sand Niggadom. Spread like a pollen of filthy sandstorm. Filthy Arab disease.

7. Arabs smell worse than African-Americans, Hispanics, or Whites. Didn't Charles Darwin caught that insect disease?

6. Where's the server princess lady- in Ghana? I don't think that she like me, after my direct flirtatious message.

5. Do you like being welcomed by the lands of wool-machinery in the yarn of gum-bands toy of cats and its flexible, elastic weakness state of mind?

4. What's the difference between Alzheimer's Disease and egg? There is no single difference, except for atomic bomb.

3. Is Russia just a confused Arabic user, or are Russians against Arabs? Answer: Both.

2. Some 77 thousand users follow me. No kidding, I'm not your average Joe.

1. Man, them darn Jewish leverages. Aren't they responsible for our house market crisis?

EXTRA CREDIT: It's probably because they (Arabs) got their anus raped 9,000 times 2,000 years ago in the name of "Ra" (0)