Is Obama being too nice a leftist organization? Apparently, bills are being passed that seem to put everything out of mainstream. Is this simply a fear of giving in to foreigners?
I don't get it. Does President Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad even know about it? Wouldn't it be great if he suddenly learn of this information, and cut the relations with Chavez out of racist sentiments? Wouldn't it also be great if he feel a little uncomfortable?
Who knows. Probably won't happen anyway. I'm pretty sure that the Iranian president care more about economics than political or religious beliefs.... Or would he? It would be a dramatic joke if this actually happen.
Then again, probably not. Perhaps I'm just bored, looking for the way to exploit the Iranian dictator as appointed by the ruling clergy, rather than fair election. Or could the ruling supreme clergy be a little nosy and issue afatwa? ;-)
I need some entertainment here, as I am unable to sleep and tired of news lately, and firing up cigarettes as trying to stay positive.
Scene A:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I heard that you're homosexual. Is that true?
Chavez: Why do you ask?
Ahmadjinejad: I just found out the information source.
Chavez: I see. And if I said yes?
Ahmadjinejad: Are you Jewish?
Chavez: No, why?
*phone clicks*
Chavez: Hello?
Scene B:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I missed you. When can I see you next time?
Chavez: Aw, mi amor.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Are Germans Convinced? (NOTE: it does not make sense that British has labelled my work as "duplicate content". I was completely on my own).
A psychology note on my "scared" employer's reaction to shaven hair
When I'd read about that bin Laden gave a warning messages to German troops, I wasn't entirely convinced. Surely, as anti-Semite experts claim, including bin Laden, certain ethnic of Muslim populations are very afraid of Germans and their "sleeper" Nazism. And for a very good reason. An Afghan was really scared of me, even though I was an employee; therefore, I assumed there was a cover-up going on under the Afghans-adopted KGB community.
Interestingly, Soviets accused Americans of fascist movements and conspiracy during the cold war. Although American economy was initiated in a little "fascist" economy style way, it was not as extreme as Europeans. One could argue that history is part of bias, and that we cannot simply rewrite new history due to ties (or conflicts) to the last 5,000 years.
Why would I mention 5,000 years, rather than 2,500 years ago? Simply because of Sanskrit studies that goes as far as 3,000, or perhaps 2,000 year B.C. Indeed, in order to master the Sanskrit language, which is dead language, one must literally master the mythology and stories itself. One could say that it is more of folklore practices in order to pick up the language itself. Obviously, it is a racist and systematic annihilation, in which the society cannot really modernize.
Obviously, racism is shaped by history, rather than vice versa. In some scholar studies, it was even said that slaves were treated fairly and just in some states prior to Civil War. There were larger and poorer white people in Southern states, only to join the military as to achieve their economic status. Ironically, after the emancipation of slavery, whites and blacks generally got poorer on worse scale only to feed the appeasement of industrialist Northern states as victory.
Indian society, on other hand, has a very racist-motivated system: the caste system. I refer to those society in the past as "purifying the class-people of economics based on color-skins". Interestingly enough, Durkheim, a 19th century sociologist, himself has referred to Russian population as "the original source of Aryan people". The colossal mother-tongue family has probably helped Greek to conquer the states of Middle East few millennial later under Alexander the Great. Although I'm a little suspicious of the original dating of Vedic myth, due to the following reasons: validity of calendar dating in Babylon prior to 3rd millennium b.c., or the likes, or whatever the timeline it was in, simply because there were significant race disputes between three groups.
According to the mythology, two ethnic groups were allied against inhabitants of India (which will be discussed later). I wish not to discuss the authenticity of history; as I am too lazy to check the data myself, simply because of nuclear time-machine that has gotten my head in confusion in the first place. All I do know is thus: this happened either before 1,000 or 2,000 B.C.E. The reason of being not interested in authenticity is too far a simple one: a dissident between Chinese calendar and "Westernized" calendar, as well as controversial computational "time-machine" stimulants.
And, for most part, according to China, Qin destroyed the history himself and remade it. It may be part of propaganda, or perhaps it was necessary to destroy the information? According to the sacred Indic scriptures, two races were annihilated in a "giant fireball of doom" that led to their cities (or perhaps few) to extinct. Similarly, a quote was said in the old testament of Catholic Bible, if I remember correctly, Genesis 9:18: *looking for the bible*.
Oops, I am quite mistaken: I checked, it is 19:18 to 19:25. On the off subject, interestingly, the 23rd chromosome of down syndrome is located as well specifically. Back to subject, the quote is written as thus:
18 And Lot said to them: I beseech thee, my Lord,
19 Because thy servant hath found grace before thee, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shewn to me, in saving my life, and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil seize me, and I die:
20 There is this city here at hand, to which I may flee. It is a little one, and I shall be saved in it. Is it not a little one. and my soul shall live?
21 And he said to him: Behold, also in this, I have heard thy prayers, not to destroy the city for which thou hast spoken.
22 Make haste and be saved there, because I cannot do any thing till thou go in t hither. Therefore the name of that city was called Segor.
23 The sun was risen upon the earth; and Lot entered into Segor.
24 And the lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.
25. And he destroyed these cities, and all the country about: all the inhabitants of the cities, and all things that spring form the earth.
Yet, the Catholic bible was not universal in South Asia back then. Nor did it actually go any farther than that. Indeed, the "God" in this sense seems to be some kind "president" in the nuclear control scheme upon the deceived homosexual person (possibly diseased or infected with medical condition of AIDS, or easily observed reports of symptoms).
Which reminds me: wasn't NYC 50% infected?
And so back to the little Indic story. This story was long ago universal, and still is today in Indian community (please don't confuse the word with Native Americans): it is dead only because it is not spoken anymore, yet readable. It is a matter of evolutionary human nature in speaking community; readings however do not die hard. Does that mean intellectually inferior species die off from nuclear blasts? It is well known that nuclear war would precede an ice age (although it may be assumed that holocausts would be better off to some people).
In the end, though, Hitler himself did decline the nuclear plan because he knew it would be very dangerous. In addition, he would prefer to internationalize the globalization, rather than nuclear armageddon all over the world. Yet Josef Stalin wanted secrets from the research, under the name of Mother Land, in order to control the world under technology through scientist-spies. Perhaps Hitler did justify the invasion of Poland, where he might have suspected the spies amongst them. As it turned out, some spies were purely emigrant Russian ones.
Again, as is well evident under the NATO: Are Germans really convinced of Iran and North Korea's doings, if they are backed by Russian "ally"? Therefore, this may be the position where Merkel is weakened. However weakened, I praise her of doing as best as she can for the democrats. It is this precise reason as of why I have not done anything lately in the most of September: I was waiting for German election to be over.
Perhaps I'm a little impatient at this moment, typing up as usual, a day before election. I have waited precisely because of the coalition decision. It would seem that Merkel should have teamed with Steinmeier, though: she has probably underestimated the power of information, like most of Westernized countries, due to the insecurity and many other reasonable doubts toward certain Communist, as well as the certain mass-media-jihadist-sponsored country. Of course, I consider myself as a Christian-Nazi crusader, like most Europeans.
Admittedly, I used to be atheist and current agnostic myself, by Christianity I mean thus: I practice secularist within a degree of common sense of background as a historian and the justifiable reasons to fight. Although, atheists should realize that religion can't really escape their minds in the first place, some people did call me "European-like" talker rather than common American, according to European-born from whom I encountered. I was reminded again and again that I discuss and talk a lot like an European person. Perhaps it is because I am deaf and I am immune to the American culture way of leanings during childhood. Otherwise, just fight in what you believe in, regardless of whether you are Christian or Atheist. For me, I fight for America, even though I am a secular Christian: I was originally raised in church, therefore, I am permanently mind printed with head full of religious studies.
Yet I feel more belonging to the Church rather than any stupid outside religions, such as racist Hindi and fascist Muslims alike. Indeed, I would rather kill a billion of Hindi with Moslems help anyway. Or perhaps bin Laden has just refused me a bargain in exchange for his cowardice. Show me the bravery, will you, then, to prove this? Or has anti-New-Romans (aka Americans) has taken your mind too far off? Perhaps bin Laden hasn't realize that he would have to take over Europe before he take over Americans (like that would ever happen :-P).
Perhaps Merkel hasn't read the latest book, "Defenders of the Faith: Charles V, Suleyman the Magnificent, and the Battle for Europe, 1520-1536". Sweet sixteen? I don't know. I'd say that sweet sixteen is ok. At least Americans don't get raped when they are 12 years old "under Islam law as allowed". It is fortunate that we are not like Islamic people. Something to think about, indeed.
I consider myself as a "moderate" Nazi, unlike "liberal" fascist Frederick Delano Roosevelt, or extreme Fascist European ones (although I agree to deaf-born restrictions rather than those deaf-turned after births, whether due to vaccine or malpractice reasons), although I consider myself as anti-Communist. Italy seems to be trending between France and Russia, but... those subjects I cannot touch for now: precisely because Paris is talking against Iran, and so I hope that President Sarkozy will emphasize more. I only hope that he does not stab in the back, whether it be Washington or Berlin.
I don't know. Maybe it is Russia's turn to be next fascist state to counter its media... It needs to be careful, though. If it needs fascism, then it would need Europe to support it as a neutral Socialist region and give in to some kind of policy, as Sweden did during World War II.
Otherwise, no one trust Russia, anyway, since the days of Attila the Hun, as well as suspicious alchemist terrorism dumping through sewage during the Great Plague out of Poland. Or perhaps is this the new era of 21st century for Westernized nations as well as Russia? (neglecting South America and its blind geopolitical difficulties, as well as Libya or Iran). Putin does have issues with terrorism, though, although there are a lot of home-brew Nazis. One could say that Putin is copycatting Reaganomics through the sales of weapons to enemy countries, which are considered probable bad both for USA and NATO as well as Asian allies.
There you go: Russia flatly denied of its trustworthiness. Unless we get something in bargain in return for the mistake that Obama sold to Eastern Europe as in lowering the missile shield project in "delaying" matter.
It is probably wise to remind that China have no says in this: since it supports the North Korea technology selling, as well as its primary goal to take over the control of international means (which has not happened since the biblical Egyptian regime and its former silk road, apparently....).
When I'd read about that bin Laden gave a warning messages to German troops, I wasn't entirely convinced. Surely, as anti-Semite experts claim, including bin Laden, certain ethnic of Muslim populations are very afraid of Germans and their "sleeper" Nazism. And for a very good reason. An Afghan was really scared of me, even though I was an employee; therefore, I assumed there was a cover-up going on under the Afghans-adopted KGB community.
Interestingly, Soviets accused Americans of fascist movements and conspiracy during the cold war. Although American economy was initiated in a little "fascist" economy style way, it was not as extreme as Europeans. One could argue that history is part of bias, and that we cannot simply rewrite new history due to ties (or conflicts) to the last 5,000 years.
Why would I mention 5,000 years, rather than 2,500 years ago? Simply because of Sanskrit studies that goes as far as 3,000, or perhaps 2,000 year B.C. Indeed, in order to master the Sanskrit language, which is dead language, one must literally master the mythology and stories itself. One could say that it is more of folklore practices in order to pick up the language itself. Obviously, it is a racist and systematic annihilation, in which the society cannot really modernize.
Obviously, racism is shaped by history, rather than vice versa. In some scholar studies, it was even said that slaves were treated fairly and just in some states prior to Civil War. There were larger and poorer white people in Southern states, only to join the military as to achieve their economic status. Ironically, after the emancipation of slavery, whites and blacks generally got poorer on worse scale only to feed the appeasement of industrialist Northern states as victory.
Indian society, on other hand, has a very racist-motivated system: the caste system. I refer to those society in the past as "purifying the class-people of economics based on color-skins". Interestingly enough, Durkheim, a 19th century sociologist, himself has referred to Russian population as "the original source of Aryan people". The colossal mother-tongue family has probably helped Greek to conquer the states of Middle East few millennial later under Alexander the Great. Although I'm a little suspicious of the original dating of Vedic myth, due to the following reasons: validity of calendar dating in Babylon prior to 3rd millennium b.c., or the likes, or whatever the timeline it was in, simply because there were significant race disputes between three groups.
According to the mythology, two ethnic groups were allied against inhabitants of India (which will be discussed later). I wish not to discuss the authenticity of history; as I am too lazy to check the data myself, simply because of nuclear time-machine that has gotten my head in confusion in the first place. All I do know is thus: this happened either before 1,000 or 2,000 B.C.E. The reason of being not interested in authenticity is too far a simple one: a dissident between Chinese calendar and "Westernized" calendar, as well as controversial computational "time-machine" stimulants.
And, for most part, according to China, Qin destroyed the history himself and remade it. It may be part of propaganda, or perhaps it was necessary to destroy the information? According to the sacred Indic scriptures, two races were annihilated in a "giant fireball of doom" that led to their cities (or perhaps few) to extinct. Similarly, a quote was said in the old testament of Catholic Bible, if I remember correctly, Genesis 9:18: *looking for the bible*.
Oops, I am quite mistaken: I checked, it is 19:18 to 19:25. On the off subject, interestingly, the 23rd chromosome of down syndrome is located as well specifically. Back to subject, the quote is written as thus:
18 And Lot said to them: I beseech thee, my Lord,
19 Because thy servant hath found grace before thee, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shewn to me, in saving my life, and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil seize me, and I die:
20 There is this city here at hand, to which I may flee. It is a little one, and I shall be saved in it. Is it not a little one. and my soul shall live?
21 And he said to him: Behold, also in this, I have heard thy prayers, not to destroy the city for which thou hast spoken.
22 Make haste and be saved there, because I cannot do any thing till thou go in t hither. Therefore the name of that city was called Segor.
23 The sun was risen upon the earth; and Lot entered into Segor.
24 And the lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.
25. And he destroyed these cities, and all the country about: all the inhabitants of the cities, and all things that spring form the earth.
Yet, the Catholic bible was not universal in South Asia back then. Nor did it actually go any farther than that. Indeed, the "God" in this sense seems to be some kind "president" in the nuclear control scheme upon the deceived homosexual person (possibly diseased or infected with medical condition of AIDS, or easily observed reports of symptoms).
Which reminds me: wasn't NYC 50% infected?
And so back to the little Indic story. This story was long ago universal, and still is today in Indian community (please don't confuse the word with Native Americans): it is dead only because it is not spoken anymore, yet readable. It is a matter of evolutionary human nature in speaking community; readings however do not die hard. Does that mean intellectually inferior species die off from nuclear blasts? It is well known that nuclear war would precede an ice age (although it may be assumed that holocausts would be better off to some people).
In the end, though, Hitler himself did decline the nuclear plan because he knew it would be very dangerous. In addition, he would prefer to internationalize the globalization, rather than nuclear armageddon all over the world. Yet Josef Stalin wanted secrets from the research, under the name of Mother Land, in order to control the world under technology through scientist-spies. Perhaps Hitler did justify the invasion of Poland, where he might have suspected the spies amongst them. As it turned out, some spies were purely emigrant Russian ones.
Again, as is well evident under the NATO: Are Germans really convinced of Iran and North Korea's doings, if they are backed by Russian "ally"? Therefore, this may be the position where Merkel is weakened. However weakened, I praise her of doing as best as she can for the democrats. It is this precise reason as of why I have not done anything lately in the most of September: I was waiting for German election to be over.
Perhaps I'm a little impatient at this moment, typing up as usual, a day before election. I have waited precisely because of the coalition decision. It would seem that Merkel should have teamed with Steinmeier, though: she has probably underestimated the power of information, like most of Westernized countries, due to the insecurity and many other reasonable doubts toward certain Communist, as well as the certain mass-media-jihadist-sponsored country. Of course, I consider myself as a Christian-Nazi crusader, like most Europeans.
Admittedly, I used to be atheist and current agnostic myself, by Christianity I mean thus: I practice secularist within a degree of common sense of background as a historian and the justifiable reasons to fight. Although, atheists should realize that religion can't really escape their minds in the first place, some people did call me "European-like" talker rather than common American, according to European-born from whom I encountered. I was reminded again and again that I discuss and talk a lot like an European person. Perhaps it is because I am deaf and I am immune to the American culture way of leanings during childhood. Otherwise, just fight in what you believe in, regardless of whether you are Christian or Atheist. For me, I fight for America, even though I am a secular Christian: I was originally raised in church, therefore, I am permanently mind printed with head full of religious studies.
Yet I feel more belonging to the Church rather than any stupid outside religions, such as racist Hindi and fascist Muslims alike. Indeed, I would rather kill a billion of Hindi with Moslems help anyway. Or perhaps bin Laden has just refused me a bargain in exchange for his cowardice. Show me the bravery, will you, then, to prove this? Or has anti-New-Romans (aka Americans) has taken your mind too far off? Perhaps bin Laden hasn't realize that he would have to take over Europe before he take over Americans (like that would ever happen :-P).
Perhaps Merkel hasn't read the latest book, "Defenders of the Faith: Charles V, Suleyman the Magnificent, and the Battle for Europe, 1520-1536". Sweet sixteen? I don't know. I'd say that sweet sixteen is ok. At least Americans don't get raped when they are 12 years old "under Islam law as allowed". It is fortunate that we are not like Islamic people. Something to think about, indeed.
I consider myself as a "moderate" Nazi, unlike "liberal" fascist Frederick Delano Roosevelt, or extreme Fascist European ones (although I agree to deaf-born restrictions rather than those deaf-turned after births, whether due to vaccine or malpractice reasons), although I consider myself as anti-Communist. Italy seems to be trending between France and Russia, but... those subjects I cannot touch for now: precisely because Paris is talking against Iran, and so I hope that President Sarkozy will emphasize more. I only hope that he does not stab in the back, whether it be Washington or Berlin.
I don't know. Maybe it is Russia's turn to be next fascist state to counter its media... It needs to be careful, though. If it needs fascism, then it would need Europe to support it as a neutral Socialist region and give in to some kind of policy, as Sweden did during World War II.
Otherwise, no one trust Russia, anyway, since the days of Attila the Hun, as well as suspicious alchemist terrorism dumping through sewage during the Great Plague out of Poland. Or perhaps is this the new era of 21st century for Westernized nations as well as Russia? (neglecting South America and its blind geopolitical difficulties, as well as Libya or Iran). Putin does have issues with terrorism, though, although there are a lot of home-brew Nazis. One could say that Putin is copycatting Reaganomics through the sales of weapons to enemy countries, which are considered probable bad both for USA and NATO as well as Asian allies.
There you go: Russia flatly denied of its trustworthiness. Unless we get something in bargain in return for the mistake that Obama sold to Eastern Europe as in lowering the missile shield project in "delaying" matter.
It is probably wise to remind that China have no says in this: since it supports the North Korea technology selling, as well as its primary goal to take over the control of international means (which has not happened since the biblical Egyptian regime and its former silk road, apparently....).
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
The Icky Conversation
A Flashback of Memory Source That Happened to be in My Hands of Information Age.
"Oh, yeah," I said. "Didn't you have a transvestite threesome?"
"No, I didn't."
I thought quickly. Didn't he know? I was slow to learn that he is far behind. "I heard from an information source that you had sex with two transvestites..." I paused questionably. "It was in Arizona, no? Do you recall the threesome?" Although I haven't been around with women that much in my life, I knew it is an insane and crazy world. Heck, I never even was in Arizona in the first place. The benefits of Bush Administration's wiretapped records on Americans through foreign contacts (or guest workers, whatever that may be) and all that in my head.
"Well, it wasn't threesome. There were three. First one, hard of hearing Spanish left the scene. Both of them, second and third ones, are bisexual."
".... aren't they Spanish, if my source is right...?"
He took a moment in thought. "The hard of hearing... I think American or Spanish, I'm not sure."
I waited.
"Second one is definitely Spanish. Third one looks Mexican... or American. No, American..."
Then he was quick into thinking on his pinky finger, apparently confused with ring finger. Last one he was confused with.
"No, they weren't transvestites."
"Technology those days, you can't tell a transvestite from women," I pointed out. Suddenly, I thought it was a while since I'd see him. He really didn't know, I realized. I feel sorry for a deaf guy to be tricked into such a bad scene.
"Anyway, no, I didn't have threesome. I didn't feel comfortable because they are lesbians, so I did second one then third one afterwards," he said.
I pointed out deliberately. "Think careful. Both of them are Spanish, no?"
He was suddenly in change of mood swing. "No, no. If I did have sex with transvestites, I would kill myself," he panicked at the knowledge that I'd lent him.
I was quick to move and shut my fat mouth as usual. "No, never mind. Drop it. I lied," I said.
"You were fooling around, weren't you? You were scaring me," he laughed. "I should have known."
"I said so because you said you wanted to kill yourself if you did,"
"You're playing with my head."
"I'm not going to say a word about it," I said. I knew how suicidal he can be. Sometimes it is impossible to straighten up and do one of those straight talks, because it hurts people. Sometimes, truth hurts. I drank too slowly for almost nine hours, that I had 11 or 12 cans or so.
After we talked about other subjects, a moment before he left to home: he was still trying to figure out who the third or the fourth one was. I was thinking, perhaps he is in a state of denial... or he tried to suppress the news far behind in his head.
And so I can't sleep as of 5:33 A.M.
"Oh, yeah," I said. "Didn't you have a transvestite threesome?"
"No, I didn't."
I thought quickly. Didn't he know? I was slow to learn that he is far behind. "I heard from an information source that you had sex with two transvestites..." I paused questionably. "It was in Arizona, no? Do you recall the threesome?" Although I haven't been around with women that much in my life, I knew it is an insane and crazy world. Heck, I never even was in Arizona in the first place. The benefits of Bush Administration's wiretapped records on Americans through foreign contacts (or guest workers, whatever that may be) and all that in my head.
"Well, it wasn't threesome. There were three. First one, hard of hearing Spanish left the scene. Both of them, second and third ones, are bisexual."
".... aren't they Spanish, if my source is right...?"
He took a moment in thought. "The hard of hearing... I think American or Spanish, I'm not sure."
I waited.
"Second one is definitely Spanish. Third one looks Mexican... or American. No, American..."
Then he was quick into thinking on his pinky finger, apparently confused with ring finger. Last one he was confused with.
"No, they weren't transvestites."
"Technology those days, you can't tell a transvestite from women," I pointed out. Suddenly, I thought it was a while since I'd see him. He really didn't know, I realized. I feel sorry for a deaf guy to be tricked into such a bad scene.
"Anyway, no, I didn't have threesome. I didn't feel comfortable because they are lesbians, so I did second one then third one afterwards," he said.
I pointed out deliberately. "Think careful. Both of them are Spanish, no?"
He was suddenly in change of mood swing. "No, no. If I did have sex with transvestites, I would kill myself," he panicked at the knowledge that I'd lent him.
I was quick to move and shut my fat mouth as usual. "No, never mind. Drop it. I lied," I said.
"You were fooling around, weren't you? You were scaring me," he laughed. "I should have known."
"I said so because you said you wanted to kill yourself if you did,"
"You're playing with my head."
"I'm not going to say a word about it," I said. I knew how suicidal he can be. Sometimes it is impossible to straighten up and do one of those straight talks, because it hurts people. Sometimes, truth hurts. I drank too slowly for almost nine hours, that I had 11 or 12 cans or so.
After we talked about other subjects, a moment before he left to home: he was still trying to figure out who the third or the fourth one was. I was thinking, perhaps he is in a state of denial... or he tried to suppress the news far behind in his head.
And so I can't sleep as of 5:33 A.M.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
On Individualism in 21st Century American Progressive
Death of Individualism? (Worst Scenario: Individualism vs. Non-individualism)
So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.
The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.
During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.
The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.
The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.
Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?
However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.
The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.
This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?
So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.
The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.
During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.
The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.
The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.
Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?
However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.
The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.
This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?
An Opinion on Mormonism
A shrewd note from a writer who can't un-think.
What is Mormonism, really? Does it deserve a stand on one of Christian branches? I do not believe so. It is more of semi-Judaic Christian; much like Seven Days Adventist. Only that Mormonism is the worst Judaic-Christian branch of all. Not only did it offer men to selfishly pursue the Old Jewish days (and some Muslims in case) of polygamy, also to rewrite the American history itself under the presumed story of Moses.
It is probably unfair for me to to say that, as some Mormons might say that they are reformed today and more Christian-like. I would like to refute that one. It is one of fastest organization in the world; one that may have to do with the Zionist organization. The original Zionist organization that deal with trafficking people, which are visible from Utah to north into Canada. That began in 19th century; and the Jewish International funds began some forty years after the death of Joseph.
Is there some coincidence in the connection? Possibly very much so. I would hate to associate myself with Jewish or Muslim synagogue; the same goes for a Mormon church. I consider religion as more of Jewish than Christian one, not because of its reaffirmation of Old Testament in North America; also its close association with Zionist organization and international expansion. A Mormon would say, it happened a hundred years ago.
Although I am unsure as whether how the Mormon church receive its own funds from the state of Utah and surrounding areas all the way to north, possibly to Idaho. New church means that the very system of organization would have to be started anew from beginning of 1830s and forth on. Yet after the American Civil War, Zionist organization seemed to be in a parallel growth to Mormonism in the backyard of North America.
I do not consider that enough a transformation of transparency from Judaic associations to Christianity. The perversity of Mormons are two thousands and three decades too late. There was no need to alienate the New World into wars.
I do not intend to be a racist from Lutheran and/or Catholic point of view. I intend try to make a sense out of Mormonism and Zionist movements in a connection to international funds that robbed the monetary system out of German-Russian economies in the first place (although that is debatable on a case of post-WWI treaty as co-signed through the big three). On a second thought, Confederate states seemed to be in the same process during the Civil War period. Slavery trade, of course, is one of reasons. What about the slavery of Mormonism and Zionist movements? Does they count? How did subsidiaries play in the role of Zionist and/or Mormon movements during all those periods from pre-Civil War to post WWI periods? Perhaps I don't need to know. All I know is that I'm thankful that I am not a Mormon.
Of course, there is much more than just a background noise of microwave radiation somewhere out there in the parallel universe of religiosity. This is only an attempt to fit a picture of what happened in the backyard and how sub-histories might have played some roles. It is more of a question on outer shell, rather than the insider shell of history.
A quick derivative note: Mormon? More money, more women, move on? Hmph.
What is Mormonism, really? Does it deserve a stand on one of Christian branches? I do not believe so. It is more of semi-Judaic Christian; much like Seven Days Adventist. Only that Mormonism is the worst Judaic-Christian branch of all. Not only did it offer men to selfishly pursue the Old Jewish days (and some Muslims in case) of polygamy, also to rewrite the American history itself under the presumed story of Moses.
It is probably unfair for me to to say that, as some Mormons might say that they are reformed today and more Christian-like. I would like to refute that one. It is one of fastest organization in the world; one that may have to do with the Zionist organization. The original Zionist organization that deal with trafficking people, which are visible from Utah to north into Canada. That began in 19th century; and the Jewish International funds began some forty years after the death of Joseph.
Is there some coincidence in the connection? Possibly very much so. I would hate to associate myself with Jewish or Muslim synagogue; the same goes for a Mormon church. I consider religion as more of Jewish than Christian one, not because of its reaffirmation of Old Testament in North America; also its close association with Zionist organization and international expansion. A Mormon would say, it happened a hundred years ago.
Although I am unsure as whether how the Mormon church receive its own funds from the state of Utah and surrounding areas all the way to north, possibly to Idaho. New church means that the very system of organization would have to be started anew from beginning of 1830s and forth on. Yet after the American Civil War, Zionist organization seemed to be in a parallel growth to Mormonism in the backyard of North America.
I do not consider that enough a transformation of transparency from Judaic associations to Christianity. The perversity of Mormons are two thousands and three decades too late. There was no need to alienate the New World into wars.
I do not intend to be a racist from Lutheran and/or Catholic point of view. I intend try to make a sense out of Mormonism and Zionist movements in a connection to international funds that robbed the monetary system out of German-Russian economies in the first place (although that is debatable on a case of post-WWI treaty as co-signed through the big three). On a second thought, Confederate states seemed to be in the same process during the Civil War period. Slavery trade, of course, is one of reasons. What about the slavery of Mormonism and Zionist movements? Does they count? How did subsidiaries play in the role of Zionist and/or Mormon movements during all those periods from pre-Civil War to post WWI periods? Perhaps I don't need to know. All I know is that I'm thankful that I am not a Mormon.
Of course, there is much more than just a background noise of microwave radiation somewhere out there in the parallel universe of religiosity. This is only an attempt to fit a picture of what happened in the backyard and how sub-histories might have played some roles. It is more of a question on outer shell, rather than the insider shell of history.
A quick derivative note: Mormon? More money, more women, move on? Hmph.
Is American Democracy Swaying Towards Fascism or Communism?
A Rigid Scientific Approach to Reduce Undesired Diseases, Mutations, or the Likes (A Satire Interview with Dr. Erlich and his team)
It is well known that Russian and Germans contributed much to scientific research in World War II. Naturally, Americans back then are just "not as scientific as Europe" in general on mass scale. Medical experiments, information, and information gatherings were well known throughout the fascism in Europe.
There is a recent, latest proposal on DNA Sudoku in genotyping.
Eldridge: How does this work?
Dr. Erlich: It is very much similar to Sudoku number. We divide the blocks into sequences for A,T,G,C pool to determine the mutation factors in diseases among Jewish community, such as cystic fibrosis, from medical records.
Eldridge: Wait, wait. Slow down. Are we going to purge those people and other ethnicities on American lands.
Dr. Erlich: No. We collect samples, and test the mutation factor on DNA Sudoku.
Eldridge: Let me get this straight. May I proceed?
Dr. Erlich: Yes.
Eldridge: You're attempting to genotype each individual for a purpose of genome sequencing.
Dr. Erlich: Yes. You see, we want to eliminate diseases and undesired genes.
Eldridge: That is a logic approach, I suppose. What did Hannon mean by overcome the sequencing limitation?
Dr. Erlich: Detect and deter the mutations that cause genetic mutations.
Eldridge: In another word, cancers.
Dr. Erlich: That is one of examples.
Eldridge: Sex is a disease.
Dr. Erlich: No, that *clear throats*. No, that is an exchange of gray matters.
Eldridge: There is supposedly a "fifth" DNA sequence. A brain allele that is supposedly of higher DNA order of some kind. How does that fit in DNA Sudoku picture?
Dr. Erlich: That is undermined by gender factor.
Eldridge: What about left-handed? Right-handed? From what I know, left-handed is more prone to diseases and influenza. Otherwise, everything else is just a psychology.
Dr. Erlich: In some cases, yes. There are both benefits to both side. With DNA Sudoku, we can also multiplex and mix samples, or make a hundred of sequences from a sample.
Eldridge: So how do you identity an individual?
Dr. Erlich: We use bar codes.
Eldridge: What about insurance companies?
Dr. Erlich: That is confidential business information.
Eldridge: Wait, wait. Don't let me stop you there. So you are deciding whether if patient's economics is to be determined by his or her genetic information. Bad DNA, and that patient's life is alienated by poverty. Good DNA heritage, that patient's life won't be picking up a phone from any medical insurance company.
Dr. Erlich: I assure you, there is nothing to be concerned about. With DNA Sudoku, the costs can save us millions of dollars.
Eldridge: .....Millions of taxpayer dollars? To insurance companies or larger bio-informatics corporations? Intel corporation, maybe? Devour the money lives out of Americans?
Dr. Erlich: I can't say that. It is a business policy for me to-
Eldridge: Cut the bull. Ok, so I don't want to lose you in an argument. Just how efficiency is this DNA Sudoku?
Dr. Erlich: Once technical and methods are improved, over time we would be able to apply more wider applications.
Eldridge: Ok, I'm trying to think. There are bad and good mutations. How do you make a perfect human being with good mutations from education of bad mutations? Suppose I skip the Nazi block to add an extra column and row. That central, corner cell could turn a human into bad, malformation experiment. Otherwise, we leave the research intact, and Humans will probably be a little advanced 1,000 years later.
Dr. Erlich: I assure you, diseases can be eliminated.
Eldridge: Suppose someday you eliminate a mutation that happen to eliminate the penis organ itself. Or nipples from human males.
Dr. Erlich: I'm pretty sure that penis is not a result of mutation. It is everywhere in animal kingdom.
Eldridge: Eh, you have a point there. What about the differences in mutations between our close chimp cousins and present Humans? Or Perhaps between Neanderthals and Neo-Humans?
Dr. Erlich: That certainly can be compared.
Eldridge: That's my problem, really. When you mix the sequences in the Nazi Sudoku cell block, how do you know which indicator colors to turn off? And switch on? Maybe switch one could lead to more mutations, regardless of on or off. I mean, you can just pretend to move a block in any Nazi cell one row further or a column further, and dismiss previous one, to sequence a disease. An insect work. You could be making thousands of new diseases. How can someone deal with that?
Dr. Erlich: Information Technology department handles the genome information.
Eldridge: Wait, IT? Does that mean- Ok, never mind, so I don't want to get there. We still don't know what happened to Michael Jackson. Is there any way can you collaborate on the story of Michael Jackson's death and latest news of DNA Sudoku approach next day? Suppose you do get DNA Sudoku run smoothly on the marketplace, are you the ultimate god over any patient's life with DNA information?
Dr. Erlich: No, I try to decide what is the best for patients.
Eldridge: Profits from deaths?
Dr. Erlich: No, look, I am a trained professional-
Eldridge: Cut the crap. I'm moving on fast. Where did this idea come from?
Dr. Erlich: A 2,000 years old Chinese cryptology-
Eldridge: Wait. Cryptology? This is ridiculous. DNA Sudoku based on a 2,000 years old math theorem? Are you insane? Them Chinese people are clueless. They can't tell a poison from cure. They even used the Latin and ancient Greek for scientific names.
Dr. Erlich: *voice raising* Look, I think this interview is over. Goodbye.
Eldridge: There are other stuff you didn't answer directly-
*dialed up*
TTY OPERATOR F 9615493: Another call QQ
Eldridge: No, thank you. SK SK.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
A Preview of "Twelve Blunt Talks", A Zigzagged Note
12. You're talking to a Kaiser DNA.
11. I asked the prince yesteryear, "what is the assassin up to?" He raised his both hands and shake head. "I don't know." Prior to that, Tareq the spirit walked in.
10. Why not kill Californian debts off with robots? We would be secured border to border eventually. Let them nuke San Francisco.
9. You know how to blind youths? Make them stare at sun two hours daily. They will either go blind, or eventually get glasses.
8. I got my latest subscription of Scientific American issue the day AFTER the release of T-4 movie. From my understanding, the latest reports are so dim and hell.
7. So, my middle name has its original meaning. There was a secret Nazi deaf community: operational newspaper codenamed REDGE. That person died at the hands of Japanese secret police, at specifically chosen date: November 7, 1944, 27 years after Communist-turned Nazi revolution. That has horrified both Fatherland and Motherland for years, so much that Russia has decided to name a Moscow street after him two decades later. Miyake Hanako the girlfriend has devoted to him since then. His name was Richard Sorge, the Ford-Opel Nazi. Controversially, it is this reason that Ian Fleming based his character on James Bond. Most likely, he was a deaf German.
6. The driver of day said: "When I lived in Florida, this old guy made and install hydrogen kits like that for $300." In defensive response, "all this tell me that computer decide whether if we die engineered by pre-arranged vaccines to varying statistics."
5. I once said, "I don't think Jesus walked on water. He invented the stone-stepping throw that ended up in Hawaii, the cornerstone that were thrown down to Galapagos. See Zeus, and see a bolt of electric lighting-God Thor that began in 10,000 B.C.E., otherwise known as I.C.E.R. (I see emergency room).
A prince of Ghana empire looks nervous. "I mean in the difference between comparative-translator of Greek and nature-like translator out of Hebraic language," I tried to be reflective.
4. Liberal taxes? Screw California. Ka spirit is scary Japanese word for spirit, no? Bobby Jindal? No, thank you. I would rather elect a governor that was here since the days of Civil War of at least four or seven generations.
3. Are Rafi and Sheik Jews? I see tax of 88 cents. Don't you love it when someone fooled politicians so bad, that they play the blame game?
2. "I ain't sure if Sheik or Rafi put some erection medicines in the soup," I said to the prince. Then I realize that I was reading about evolution of cats article, when I brought hot soup over (Scientific American, June issue).
1. What's difference between bankers and lawyers? Let's kill them.
11. I asked the prince yesteryear, "what is the assassin up to?" He raised his both hands and shake head. "I don't know." Prior to that, Tareq the spirit walked in.
10. Why not kill Californian debts off with robots? We would be secured border to border eventually. Let them nuke San Francisco.
9. You know how to blind youths? Make them stare at sun two hours daily. They will either go blind, or eventually get glasses.
8. I got my latest subscription of Scientific American issue the day AFTER the release of T-4 movie. From my understanding, the latest reports are so dim and hell.
7. So, my middle name has its original meaning. There was a secret Nazi deaf community: operational newspaper codenamed REDGE. That person died at the hands of Japanese secret police, at specifically chosen date: November 7, 1944, 27 years after Communist-turned Nazi revolution. That has horrified both Fatherland and Motherland for years, so much that Russia has decided to name a Moscow street after him two decades later. Miyake Hanako the girlfriend has devoted to him since then. His name was Richard Sorge, the Ford-Opel Nazi. Controversially, it is this reason that Ian Fleming based his character on James Bond. Most likely, he was a deaf German.
6. The driver of day said: "When I lived in Florida, this old guy made and install hydrogen kits like that for $300." In defensive response, "all this tell me that computer decide whether if we die engineered by pre-arranged vaccines to varying statistics."
5. I once said, "I don't think Jesus walked on water. He invented the stone-stepping throw that ended up in Hawaii, the cornerstone that were thrown down to Galapagos. See Zeus, and see a bolt of electric lighting-God Thor that began in 10,000 B.C.E., otherwise known as I.C.E.R. (I see emergency room).
A prince of Ghana empire looks nervous. "I mean in the difference between comparative-translator of Greek and nature-like translator out of Hebraic language," I tried to be reflective.
4. Liberal taxes? Screw California. Ka spirit is scary Japanese word for spirit, no? Bobby Jindal? No, thank you. I would rather elect a governor that was here since the days of Civil War of at least four or seven generations.
3. Are Rafi and Sheik Jews? I see tax of 88 cents. Don't you love it when someone fooled politicians so bad, that they play the blame game?
2. "I ain't sure if Sheik or Rafi put some erection medicines in the soup," I said to the prince. Then I realize that I was reading about evolution of cats article, when I brought hot soup over (Scientific American, June issue).
1. What's difference between bankers and lawyers? Let's kill them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)