Assassinations of Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad and Kim Il-Jong

Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad might think that he is a strong leader, yet he can be wrong. He could be easily assassinated on KGB watch. He also knew that Israel could fly over Iraq and bombard the nuclear facilities on either American or Russian watch (that depends on Georgia's state of politics). It is witty that he might be a dog pack behind Shi'ah; he also might be alienated by true Persians who were not Muslims of national originality. Clerical leader, who holds the presiding key of all Iranian politics, could be also easily assassinated by an assertion of Russo-Georgian state and geopolitical decisions. Look at a huge bull state of Russia that could evaporate Iran's people! Is that not a grand look?

Beijing is a dangerous one. Not only it controls North Korea, but it also risks a counter-strike. Therefore, the only logical plan to avoid a nuclear bomb, is to assassinate Kim Il-Jong. Beijing is simply too circus-around-the-politics that it actually endowed its country to a mickey mouse figure, with a Mongolian royalty above the head. Assassination of Il-Jong could be very well be in discussions with Beijing and Tokyo-Washington, and perhaps even Moscow. Beijing is probably more sympathetic towards Seoul than Tokyo counterpart; for these reasons that need to be discussed on whether to assassinate the North Korea dictator, or simply replace with a benign one. It is wise to remind Beijing that the existence of Korea states was because of Japanese sacrifices in Russo-Japanese war prior to WWI. Kim Il-Jong is getting old and rotting away, wouldn't he lose his sane mind before he die? It is precisely that. He has WWII and Korean wars mentalities; not WWI mentality.

These traitors shared secrets with Bhutto, who was reasonably assassinated from an Indian informer. Therefore, Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad and Kim Il-Jong might justifiably deserve the assassinations as nations at large see fit to do so. There are plenty of people willing to do so, I assume.