On Individualism in 21st Century American Progressive

Death of Individualism? (Worst Scenario: Individualism vs. Non-individualism)

So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.

The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.

During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.

The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.

The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.

Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?

However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.

The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.

This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?