“What’s wrong? You seem distracted,” Hans Gruber said.
“Just thinking.”
“About what?”
“How Netanyahu and his Zionist hackers managed to block my windows-based program access to the Middle Eastern network, in which I developed on Mac to run it in the first place,” I shot straight to the subject.
“Consequently, does that mean that American government is to be the blame?”
“No,” he said.
“Of course not. It’s the damn Semitic hackers meddling in the middle of two main languages: Hebraic and Arabic. Wasn’t that how they hacked into Iran’s nuclear progress information on computers?”
“I suppose so. It does make sense.”
“I no longer have access to the program as result of Israeli military/scientist elites. Six tunnels cutoff. Nor did I have an access to michaelshermer.com nor skeptic.com on a browser,” I remarked.
“And then, I thought about my recent article and Ahmadinejad’s complain to UN on the USA’s distance. I went back and over after few days of stuck-in for an English assignment.”
“Well, what did you find?”
“Even I was blinded by my own work. I went in the Google Chrome operating system, and, to my surprise, michaelshermer.com and skeptic.com does work.”
“Have you heard about the news?”
“What news?”
“The president of Poland and his 88 passengers, full of military
officers as well as civilian workers were all killed.”
I thought for a moment. “Must be Russian inside job. No, not Moscow… Perhaps Belarus.”
“The report is said to be technical error.”
“Technical? How technical is it?”
“Smolensk.”
“The main ground in which wounded Nazi soldiers were took care of and flew to Germany in World War II?” I said. “Well, Stalingrad comes to the mind.”
“Meaning?”
“It is probably an inside job. Russian media is just full of it. What’s the source of media?”
“According to Polish sources, it’s the Russian source that was first confirmed, then came Polish collaborators.”
“No matters,” I said. “Polish people are probably cheering for his death. So war fronts don’t come to them.”
“You sure about that?”
“Yes. If Russia is really right on the technical issue… then I’d say that somehow someone has held a secret recipe of apple and PS3 architecture of codes. Russia still runs on the world’s oldest computer system, after all…” I thought for a moment. “Dark side of the moon or not… it’s likely that the Mac system is somehow partially broken through.”
“What do you mean by that?”
“I’m referring to Balto-Slavic cyber-warfare in recent years. And, of course, my little affair digging in the Chechnya region of Georgia.”
“Oh.”
“Perhaps that airplane got caught in between. The only question is whether if the poured money out of Israel into Ukrainian economics is somehow a pivot to this incident…” I stopped abruptly.
“Perhaps Obama has it got all wrong: nuke goes into Israel… then Obama would response by blasting the hell out of Iran.”
“Surely you’re not blind?”
“No. There are reports that Israel was also behind the 9/11 with help of Egyptian cousins into the Palestine region. That is when they became spies for Israel,” my voice heightened slightly. “Muslim faith is close to Jewish faith than Christianity in its practicality sense of Sufism beyond Iran anyway. Only, Persian hold the leash on its peoples. Middle East is remarkably different from the eastern parts of South Asia, with Iran in between.”
“What does this mean? Are you saying that Iran has a conditional right to invade Israel and its lands?”
“I’m afraid so,” I admitted. “If Turkish government would be willing to arm its campaign. For good. Period. The demise of Israel would be better for everybody. It is a little illegitimate country full of cheaters, liars, and massive money thieves,” I said with little remorse.
“You do realize that it is against American policy,” Hans said.
“Obama policy,” I straightened him up. “Once upon a time… there was American accountant helping Iran government out. That was prior to World War I, which led to World War II.”
“So I’ve heard.”
“This is just a fair chance to shoot it out. Destroy the Zionist and its banned Protocols of the Elders of Zion text,” I said. “Why not? This would be beneficial for upcoming Republican election of autumn 2010.”
“Well, you said it.”
“Mitt Romney is a Zionist headache though,” I said. “He is a particular fellow that I don’t agree with. Ron Paul/Palin ticket for 2012 would be nice. Mikey Huckabee isn’t too bad. Newt Gingrich is okay.”
“Why is that?”
“You could say that here in North America… we perceive Mormonism as Neo-Jewish people, or Neo-Zionists, in parallel to European metaphor of Jews,” I said. “This is nothing new. This has been reported prior to Civil War for over 150 years ago anyway.”
“Are you ok in head?” came a boring and unnecessary psychological survey response.
“Definite head. Mormonism were probably a notorious and studious of economics… just like Jews are,” I shot back.
“Your psychological questions do not work on me this time. It is that simple.”
“Why do you think so?”
I laughed. “Perhaps you’ve underestimated me. Is it because I’m a simple deaf fellow in your eyes? No. It is much more complicated than that,” I corrected in a cold and harsh way.
“Would you like to tell me?”
“This is getting boring-some,” I responded with a visible thought of that little gay coward. I predicted it, and I have expected this, I thought. He shouldn’t have gotten himself into this trouble if he didn’t expose himself… or he would be killed ruthlessly and simply just like Martin Luther King or Robert Kennedy, only that this case is different. Too many anti-homosexuals in America, I thought.
“I hope you aren’t thinking of evil thoughts,” Hans said.
“No, I’m not,” I smiled. “Actually, I’m happier.”
“Why is that?”
“Because you have no idea. You wasted your time in psychology department for too long time, when facts came down to the simplicity of human condition. Your idiotic studies did you no good, yet they offer you such a silly position. It is a circus,” I said out of mockery.
“This isn’t in my position to-”
“Cut it off already, slacker,” I echoed. “If you’d study psychology in Germany, it amounted to almost nothing. Isn’t that the truth?”
“What do you mean exactly?”
I almost rolled my eyes up. “My goodness. You English people. What is it with you? One of those Huxley Syndrome?” I straightened up the subject. “No wonder that Obama care policy is such a failure, except babies sector, perhaps.”
He was taking his notes.
“Notes are useless. You just want to keep me talking so that you can keep your job,” I said. “Of course, some idiot Curtis guy decided to weep his coward ass out. He shouldn’t have protest in the first place anyway. He is probably unaware of how much… feisty beasts that are all over Americans.”
“How big?”
I looked at him straightforward. “You really don’t know, do you? That is so typical with you psychologists these days,” I thought carefully and analytically.
In one of those rare moments, Hans stopped scrambling his notes.
“You silly human being. You know what, maybe I’ll write a note to some Tea Party movement circles to send the bombs at certain senators who voted for Health care,” I said frankly. “It is too easy for me to do so.”
For a minute, he froze at the thought.
“I dare you to write any further notes about me. You would get in trouble eventually, if… this country governmental structure change at a colossal speed by 2016 or 2020,” I thought figuratively.
“And why is that dangerous?”
I looked at him close-up. “Are you really not taking this serious at all?”
He shuddered upon the scenario of perceived threat.
“Don’t worry, you won’t be hurt at all,” I said. “You’re just a potent to my poison in heart. I need someone to vent in, in a sense,” I confessed. “Unless…”
“Unless what?”
“I know what Russians are up to. As a student of teacher, one said: are you afraid of me, class? I didn’t put up a hand up, because I knew that I’m the only sole evil person in that room who isn’t afraid of that teacher.”
______________________________________________________________
Meanwhile, Russian planes were all over the Tehran and Georgian regions, deciding whether if they should bomb the doomsday out of them or not. Belorussians people were busy monitoring the Ukrainian people and reporting its consequential damage to the Muscovite economy. Further surveillance were done under the name of Motherland and surrounding Westernized Eastern Europe, although they are impoverished and improving. Time for destruction of Israel, a politician thought. This is a perfect opportunity.
______________________________________________________________
Meanwhile, the Turkish forces were sent to the war machine against the North half of Israel. Egyptian troops, on other hands, were sent to destroy in the south section of Israel, with support of Hezbollah and Hamas combined. Upon meeting the middle borderline, Turkish spokesperson said: “We have done it. Grace to the God, by God, we have done it.” Next day, it was said that over a five-hundred thousand terrorist-soldiers were sufficient to damage the politics and control of Israel.
______________________________________________________________
During that time, Venezuelan and Uruguayan governments were taking care of cleansing of Brazilian civilians, prisoners, and Portuguese people alike. Genocides were mandatory before the Olympics in their eyes. It was an economical opportunity to export the goods to USA, while computer scientists and virus-inflicted persons were being killed. Justice is served under Hugo Chavez for the control of forestry and oil systems.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Friday, November 20, 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Is Hugo Chavez Gay?
Is Obama being too nice a leftist organization? Apparently, bills are being passed that seem to put everything out of mainstream. Is this simply a fear of giving in to foreigners?
I don't get it. Does President Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad even know about it? Wouldn't it be great if he suddenly learn of this information, and cut the relations with Chavez out of racist sentiments? Wouldn't it also be great if he feel a little uncomfortable?
Who knows. Probably won't happen anyway. I'm pretty sure that the Iranian president care more about economics than political or religious beliefs.... Or would he? It would be a dramatic joke if this actually happen.
Then again, probably not. Perhaps I'm just bored, looking for the way to exploit the Iranian dictator as appointed by the ruling clergy, rather than fair election. Or could the ruling supreme clergy be a little nosy and issue afatwa? ;-)
I need some entertainment here, as I am unable to sleep and tired of news lately, and firing up cigarettes as trying to stay positive.
Scene A:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I heard that you're homosexual. Is that true?
Chavez: Why do you ask?
Ahmadjinejad: I just found out the information source.
Chavez: I see. And if I said yes?
Ahmadjinejad: Are you Jewish?
Chavez: No, why?
*phone clicks*
Chavez: Hello?
Scene B:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I missed you. When can I see you next time?
Chavez: Aw, mi amor.
I don't get it. Does President Mahmoud Ahmadjinejad even know about it? Wouldn't it be great if he suddenly learn of this information, and cut the relations with Chavez out of racist sentiments? Wouldn't it also be great if he feel a little uncomfortable?
Who knows. Probably won't happen anyway. I'm pretty sure that the Iranian president care more about economics than political or religious beliefs.... Or would he? It would be a dramatic joke if this actually happen.
Then again, probably not. Perhaps I'm just bored, looking for the way to exploit the Iranian dictator as appointed by the ruling clergy, rather than fair election. Or could the ruling supreme clergy be a little nosy and issue afatwa? ;-)
I need some entertainment here, as I am unable to sleep and tired of news lately, and firing up cigarettes as trying to stay positive.
Scene A:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I heard that you're homosexual. Is that true?
Chavez: Why do you ask?
Ahmadjinejad: I just found out the information source.
Chavez: I see. And if I said yes?
Ahmadjinejad: Are you Jewish?
Chavez: No, why?
*phone clicks*
Chavez: Hello?
Scene B:
*picks up phone*
Chavez: Si?
Ahmadjinejad: I missed you. When can I see you next time?
Chavez: Aw, mi amor.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Are Germans Convinced? (NOTE: it does not make sense that British has labelled my work as "duplicate content". I was completely on my own).
A psychology note on my "scared" employer's reaction to shaven hair
When I'd read about that bin Laden gave a warning messages to German troops, I wasn't entirely convinced. Surely, as anti-Semite experts claim, including bin Laden, certain ethnic of Muslim populations are very afraid of Germans and their "sleeper" Nazism. And for a very good reason. An Afghan was really scared of me, even though I was an employee; therefore, I assumed there was a cover-up going on under the Afghans-adopted KGB community.
Interestingly, Soviets accused Americans of fascist movements and conspiracy during the cold war. Although American economy was initiated in a little "fascist" economy style way, it was not as extreme as Europeans. One could argue that history is part of bias, and that we cannot simply rewrite new history due to ties (or conflicts) to the last 5,000 years.
Why would I mention 5,000 years, rather than 2,500 years ago? Simply because of Sanskrit studies that goes as far as 3,000, or perhaps 2,000 year B.C. Indeed, in order to master the Sanskrit language, which is dead language, one must literally master the mythology and stories itself. One could say that it is more of folklore practices in order to pick up the language itself. Obviously, it is a racist and systematic annihilation, in which the society cannot really modernize.
Obviously, racism is shaped by history, rather than vice versa. In some scholar studies, it was even said that slaves were treated fairly and just in some states prior to Civil War. There were larger and poorer white people in Southern states, only to join the military as to achieve their economic status. Ironically, after the emancipation of slavery, whites and blacks generally got poorer on worse scale only to feed the appeasement of industrialist Northern states as victory.
Indian society, on other hand, has a very racist-motivated system: the caste system. I refer to those society in the past as "purifying the class-people of economics based on color-skins". Interestingly enough, Durkheim, a 19th century sociologist, himself has referred to Russian population as "the original source of Aryan people". The colossal mother-tongue family has probably helped Greek to conquer the states of Middle East few millennial later under Alexander the Great. Although I'm a little suspicious of the original dating of Vedic myth, due to the following reasons: validity of calendar dating in Babylon prior to 3rd millennium b.c., or the likes, or whatever the timeline it was in, simply because there were significant race disputes between three groups.
According to the mythology, two ethnic groups were allied against inhabitants of India (which will be discussed later). I wish not to discuss the authenticity of history; as I am too lazy to check the data myself, simply because of nuclear time-machine that has gotten my head in confusion in the first place. All I do know is thus: this happened either before 1,000 or 2,000 B.C.E. The reason of being not interested in authenticity is too far a simple one: a dissident between Chinese calendar and "Westernized" calendar, as well as controversial computational "time-machine" stimulants.
And, for most part, according to China, Qin destroyed the history himself and remade it. It may be part of propaganda, or perhaps it was necessary to destroy the information? According to the sacred Indic scriptures, two races were annihilated in a "giant fireball of doom" that led to their cities (or perhaps few) to extinct. Similarly, a quote was said in the old testament of Catholic Bible, if I remember correctly, Genesis 9:18: *looking for the bible*.
Oops, I am quite mistaken: I checked, it is 19:18 to 19:25. On the off subject, interestingly, the 23rd chromosome of down syndrome is located as well specifically. Back to subject, the quote is written as thus:
18 And Lot said to them: I beseech thee, my Lord,
19 Because thy servant hath found grace before thee, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shewn to me, in saving my life, and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil seize me, and I die:
20 There is this city here at hand, to which I may flee. It is a little one, and I shall be saved in it. Is it not a little one. and my soul shall live?
21 And he said to him: Behold, also in this, I have heard thy prayers, not to destroy the city for which thou hast spoken.
22 Make haste and be saved there, because I cannot do any thing till thou go in t hither. Therefore the name of that city was called Segor.
23 The sun was risen upon the earth; and Lot entered into Segor.
24 And the lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.
25. And he destroyed these cities, and all the country about: all the inhabitants of the cities, and all things that spring form the earth.
Yet, the Catholic bible was not universal in South Asia back then. Nor did it actually go any farther than that. Indeed, the "God" in this sense seems to be some kind "president" in the nuclear control scheme upon the deceived homosexual person (possibly diseased or infected with medical condition of AIDS, or easily observed reports of symptoms).
Which reminds me: wasn't NYC 50% infected?
And so back to the little Indic story. This story was long ago universal, and still is today in Indian community (please don't confuse the word with Native Americans): it is dead only because it is not spoken anymore, yet readable. It is a matter of evolutionary human nature in speaking community; readings however do not die hard. Does that mean intellectually inferior species die off from nuclear blasts? It is well known that nuclear war would precede an ice age (although it may be assumed that holocausts would be better off to some people).
In the end, though, Hitler himself did decline the nuclear plan because he knew it would be very dangerous. In addition, he would prefer to internationalize the globalization, rather than nuclear armageddon all over the world. Yet Josef Stalin wanted secrets from the research, under the name of Mother Land, in order to control the world under technology through scientist-spies. Perhaps Hitler did justify the invasion of Poland, where he might have suspected the spies amongst them. As it turned out, some spies were purely emigrant Russian ones.
Again, as is well evident under the NATO: Are Germans really convinced of Iran and North Korea's doings, if they are backed by Russian "ally"? Therefore, this may be the position where Merkel is weakened. However weakened, I praise her of doing as best as she can for the democrats. It is this precise reason as of why I have not done anything lately in the most of September: I was waiting for German election to be over.
Perhaps I'm a little impatient at this moment, typing up as usual, a day before election. I have waited precisely because of the coalition decision. It would seem that Merkel should have teamed with Steinmeier, though: she has probably underestimated the power of information, like most of Westernized countries, due to the insecurity and many other reasonable doubts toward certain Communist, as well as the certain mass-media-jihadist-sponsored country. Of course, I consider myself as a Christian-Nazi crusader, like most Europeans.
Admittedly, I used to be atheist and current agnostic myself, by Christianity I mean thus: I practice secularist within a degree of common sense of background as a historian and the justifiable reasons to fight. Although, atheists should realize that religion can't really escape their minds in the first place, some people did call me "European-like" talker rather than common American, according to European-born from whom I encountered. I was reminded again and again that I discuss and talk a lot like an European person. Perhaps it is because I am deaf and I am immune to the American culture way of leanings during childhood. Otherwise, just fight in what you believe in, regardless of whether you are Christian or Atheist. For me, I fight for America, even though I am a secular Christian: I was originally raised in church, therefore, I am permanently mind printed with head full of religious studies.
Yet I feel more belonging to the Church rather than any stupid outside religions, such as racist Hindi and fascist Muslims alike. Indeed, I would rather kill a billion of Hindi with Moslems help anyway. Or perhaps bin Laden has just refused me a bargain in exchange for his cowardice. Show me the bravery, will you, then, to prove this? Or has anti-New-Romans (aka Americans) has taken your mind too far off? Perhaps bin Laden hasn't realize that he would have to take over Europe before he take over Americans (like that would ever happen :-P).
Perhaps Merkel hasn't read the latest book, "Defenders of the Faith: Charles V, Suleyman the Magnificent, and the Battle for Europe, 1520-1536". Sweet sixteen? I don't know. I'd say that sweet sixteen is ok. At least Americans don't get raped when they are 12 years old "under Islam law as allowed". It is fortunate that we are not like Islamic people. Something to think about, indeed.
I consider myself as a "moderate" Nazi, unlike "liberal" fascist Frederick Delano Roosevelt, or extreme Fascist European ones (although I agree to deaf-born restrictions rather than those deaf-turned after births, whether due to vaccine or malpractice reasons), although I consider myself as anti-Communist. Italy seems to be trending between France and Russia, but... those subjects I cannot touch for now: precisely because Paris is talking against Iran, and so I hope that President Sarkozy will emphasize more. I only hope that he does not stab in the back, whether it be Washington or Berlin.
I don't know. Maybe it is Russia's turn to be next fascist state to counter its media... It needs to be careful, though. If it needs fascism, then it would need Europe to support it as a neutral Socialist region and give in to some kind of policy, as Sweden did during World War II.
Otherwise, no one trust Russia, anyway, since the days of Attila the Hun, as well as suspicious alchemist terrorism dumping through sewage during the Great Plague out of Poland. Or perhaps is this the new era of 21st century for Westernized nations as well as Russia? (neglecting South America and its blind geopolitical difficulties, as well as Libya or Iran). Putin does have issues with terrorism, though, although there are a lot of home-brew Nazis. One could say that Putin is copycatting Reaganomics through the sales of weapons to enemy countries, which are considered probable bad both for USA and NATO as well as Asian allies.
There you go: Russia flatly denied of its trustworthiness. Unless we get something in bargain in return for the mistake that Obama sold to Eastern Europe as in lowering the missile shield project in "delaying" matter.
It is probably wise to remind that China have no says in this: since it supports the North Korea technology selling, as well as its primary goal to take over the control of international means (which has not happened since the biblical Egyptian regime and its former silk road, apparently....).
When I'd read about that bin Laden gave a warning messages to German troops, I wasn't entirely convinced. Surely, as anti-Semite experts claim, including bin Laden, certain ethnic of Muslim populations are very afraid of Germans and their "sleeper" Nazism. And for a very good reason. An Afghan was really scared of me, even though I was an employee; therefore, I assumed there was a cover-up going on under the Afghans-adopted KGB community.
Interestingly, Soviets accused Americans of fascist movements and conspiracy during the cold war. Although American economy was initiated in a little "fascist" economy style way, it was not as extreme as Europeans. One could argue that history is part of bias, and that we cannot simply rewrite new history due to ties (or conflicts) to the last 5,000 years.
Why would I mention 5,000 years, rather than 2,500 years ago? Simply because of Sanskrit studies that goes as far as 3,000, or perhaps 2,000 year B.C. Indeed, in order to master the Sanskrit language, which is dead language, one must literally master the mythology and stories itself. One could say that it is more of folklore practices in order to pick up the language itself. Obviously, it is a racist and systematic annihilation, in which the society cannot really modernize.
Obviously, racism is shaped by history, rather than vice versa. In some scholar studies, it was even said that slaves were treated fairly and just in some states prior to Civil War. There were larger and poorer white people in Southern states, only to join the military as to achieve their economic status. Ironically, after the emancipation of slavery, whites and blacks generally got poorer on worse scale only to feed the appeasement of industrialist Northern states as victory.
Indian society, on other hand, has a very racist-motivated system: the caste system. I refer to those society in the past as "purifying the class-people of economics based on color-skins". Interestingly enough, Durkheim, a 19th century sociologist, himself has referred to Russian population as "the original source of Aryan people". The colossal mother-tongue family has probably helped Greek to conquer the states of Middle East few millennial later under Alexander the Great. Although I'm a little suspicious of the original dating of Vedic myth, due to the following reasons: validity of calendar dating in Babylon prior to 3rd millennium b.c., or the likes, or whatever the timeline it was in, simply because there were significant race disputes between three groups.
According to the mythology, two ethnic groups were allied against inhabitants of India (which will be discussed later). I wish not to discuss the authenticity of history; as I am too lazy to check the data myself, simply because of nuclear time-machine that has gotten my head in confusion in the first place. All I do know is thus: this happened either before 1,000 or 2,000 B.C.E. The reason of being not interested in authenticity is too far a simple one: a dissident between Chinese calendar and "Westernized" calendar, as well as controversial computational "time-machine" stimulants.
And, for most part, according to China, Qin destroyed the history himself and remade it. It may be part of propaganda, or perhaps it was necessary to destroy the information? According to the sacred Indic scriptures, two races were annihilated in a "giant fireball of doom" that led to their cities (or perhaps few) to extinct. Similarly, a quote was said in the old testament of Catholic Bible, if I remember correctly, Genesis 9:18: *looking for the bible*.
Oops, I am quite mistaken: I checked, it is 19:18 to 19:25. On the off subject, interestingly, the 23rd chromosome of down syndrome is located as well specifically. Back to subject, the quote is written as thus:
18 And Lot said to them: I beseech thee, my Lord,
19 Because thy servant hath found grace before thee, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shewn to me, in saving my life, and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil seize me, and I die:
20 There is this city here at hand, to which I may flee. It is a little one, and I shall be saved in it. Is it not a little one. and my soul shall live?
21 And he said to him: Behold, also in this, I have heard thy prayers, not to destroy the city for which thou hast spoken.
22 Make haste and be saved there, because I cannot do any thing till thou go in t hither. Therefore the name of that city was called Segor.
23 The sun was risen upon the earth; and Lot entered into Segor.
24 And the lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.
25. And he destroyed these cities, and all the country about: all the inhabitants of the cities, and all things that spring form the earth.
Yet, the Catholic bible was not universal in South Asia back then. Nor did it actually go any farther than that. Indeed, the "God" in this sense seems to be some kind "president" in the nuclear control scheme upon the deceived homosexual person (possibly diseased or infected with medical condition of AIDS, or easily observed reports of symptoms).
Which reminds me: wasn't NYC 50% infected?
And so back to the little Indic story. This story was long ago universal, and still is today in Indian community (please don't confuse the word with Native Americans): it is dead only because it is not spoken anymore, yet readable. It is a matter of evolutionary human nature in speaking community; readings however do not die hard. Does that mean intellectually inferior species die off from nuclear blasts? It is well known that nuclear war would precede an ice age (although it may be assumed that holocausts would be better off to some people).
In the end, though, Hitler himself did decline the nuclear plan because he knew it would be very dangerous. In addition, he would prefer to internationalize the globalization, rather than nuclear armageddon all over the world. Yet Josef Stalin wanted secrets from the research, under the name of Mother Land, in order to control the world under technology through scientist-spies. Perhaps Hitler did justify the invasion of Poland, where he might have suspected the spies amongst them. As it turned out, some spies were purely emigrant Russian ones.
Again, as is well evident under the NATO: Are Germans really convinced of Iran and North Korea's doings, if they are backed by Russian "ally"? Therefore, this may be the position where Merkel is weakened. However weakened, I praise her of doing as best as she can for the democrats. It is this precise reason as of why I have not done anything lately in the most of September: I was waiting for German election to be over.
Perhaps I'm a little impatient at this moment, typing up as usual, a day before election. I have waited precisely because of the coalition decision. It would seem that Merkel should have teamed with Steinmeier, though: she has probably underestimated the power of information, like most of Westernized countries, due to the insecurity and many other reasonable doubts toward certain Communist, as well as the certain mass-media-jihadist-sponsored country. Of course, I consider myself as a Christian-Nazi crusader, like most Europeans.
Admittedly, I used to be atheist and current agnostic myself, by Christianity I mean thus: I practice secularist within a degree of common sense of background as a historian and the justifiable reasons to fight. Although, atheists should realize that religion can't really escape their minds in the first place, some people did call me "European-like" talker rather than common American, according to European-born from whom I encountered. I was reminded again and again that I discuss and talk a lot like an European person. Perhaps it is because I am deaf and I am immune to the American culture way of leanings during childhood. Otherwise, just fight in what you believe in, regardless of whether you are Christian or Atheist. For me, I fight for America, even though I am a secular Christian: I was originally raised in church, therefore, I am permanently mind printed with head full of religious studies.
Yet I feel more belonging to the Church rather than any stupid outside religions, such as racist Hindi and fascist Muslims alike. Indeed, I would rather kill a billion of Hindi with Moslems help anyway. Or perhaps bin Laden has just refused me a bargain in exchange for his cowardice. Show me the bravery, will you, then, to prove this? Or has anti-New-Romans (aka Americans) has taken your mind too far off? Perhaps bin Laden hasn't realize that he would have to take over Europe before he take over Americans (like that would ever happen :-P).
Perhaps Merkel hasn't read the latest book, "Defenders of the Faith: Charles V, Suleyman the Magnificent, and the Battle for Europe, 1520-1536". Sweet sixteen? I don't know. I'd say that sweet sixteen is ok. At least Americans don't get raped when they are 12 years old "under Islam law as allowed". It is fortunate that we are not like Islamic people. Something to think about, indeed.
I consider myself as a "moderate" Nazi, unlike "liberal" fascist Frederick Delano Roosevelt, or extreme Fascist European ones (although I agree to deaf-born restrictions rather than those deaf-turned after births, whether due to vaccine or malpractice reasons), although I consider myself as anti-Communist. Italy seems to be trending between France and Russia, but... those subjects I cannot touch for now: precisely because Paris is talking against Iran, and so I hope that President Sarkozy will emphasize more. I only hope that he does not stab in the back, whether it be Washington or Berlin.
I don't know. Maybe it is Russia's turn to be next fascist state to counter its media... It needs to be careful, though. If it needs fascism, then it would need Europe to support it as a neutral Socialist region and give in to some kind of policy, as Sweden did during World War II.
Otherwise, no one trust Russia, anyway, since the days of Attila the Hun, as well as suspicious alchemist terrorism dumping through sewage during the Great Plague out of Poland. Or perhaps is this the new era of 21st century for Westernized nations as well as Russia? (neglecting South America and its blind geopolitical difficulties, as well as Libya or Iran). Putin does have issues with terrorism, though, although there are a lot of home-brew Nazis. One could say that Putin is copycatting Reaganomics through the sales of weapons to enemy countries, which are considered probable bad both for USA and NATO as well as Asian allies.
There you go: Russia flatly denied of its trustworthiness. Unless we get something in bargain in return for the mistake that Obama sold to Eastern Europe as in lowering the missile shield project in "delaying" matter.
It is probably wise to remind that China have no says in this: since it supports the North Korea technology selling, as well as its primary goal to take over the control of international means (which has not happened since the biblical Egyptian regime and its former silk road, apparently....).
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
The Icky Conversation
A Flashback of Memory Source That Happened to be in My Hands of Information Age.
"Oh, yeah," I said. "Didn't you have a transvestite threesome?"
"No, I didn't."
I thought quickly. Didn't he know? I was slow to learn that he is far behind. "I heard from an information source that you had sex with two transvestites..." I paused questionably. "It was in Arizona, no? Do you recall the threesome?" Although I haven't been around with women that much in my life, I knew it is an insane and crazy world. Heck, I never even was in Arizona in the first place. The benefits of Bush Administration's wiretapped records on Americans through foreign contacts (or guest workers, whatever that may be) and all that in my head.
"Well, it wasn't threesome. There were three. First one, hard of hearing Spanish left the scene. Both of them, second and third ones, are bisexual."
".... aren't they Spanish, if my source is right...?"
He took a moment in thought. "The hard of hearing... I think American or Spanish, I'm not sure."
I waited.
"Second one is definitely Spanish. Third one looks Mexican... or American. No, American..."
Then he was quick into thinking on his pinky finger, apparently confused with ring finger. Last one he was confused with.
"No, they weren't transvestites."
"Technology those days, you can't tell a transvestite from women," I pointed out. Suddenly, I thought it was a while since I'd see him. He really didn't know, I realized. I feel sorry for a deaf guy to be tricked into such a bad scene.
"Anyway, no, I didn't have threesome. I didn't feel comfortable because they are lesbians, so I did second one then third one afterwards," he said.
I pointed out deliberately. "Think careful. Both of them are Spanish, no?"
He was suddenly in change of mood swing. "No, no. If I did have sex with transvestites, I would kill myself," he panicked at the knowledge that I'd lent him.
I was quick to move and shut my fat mouth as usual. "No, never mind. Drop it. I lied," I said.
"You were fooling around, weren't you? You were scaring me," he laughed. "I should have known."
"I said so because you said you wanted to kill yourself if you did,"
"You're playing with my head."
"I'm not going to say a word about it," I said. I knew how suicidal he can be. Sometimes it is impossible to straighten up and do one of those straight talks, because it hurts people. Sometimes, truth hurts. I drank too slowly for almost nine hours, that I had 11 or 12 cans or so.
After we talked about other subjects, a moment before he left to home: he was still trying to figure out who the third or the fourth one was. I was thinking, perhaps he is in a state of denial... or he tried to suppress the news far behind in his head.
And so I can't sleep as of 5:33 A.M.
"Oh, yeah," I said. "Didn't you have a transvestite threesome?"
"No, I didn't."
I thought quickly. Didn't he know? I was slow to learn that he is far behind. "I heard from an information source that you had sex with two transvestites..." I paused questionably. "It was in Arizona, no? Do you recall the threesome?" Although I haven't been around with women that much in my life, I knew it is an insane and crazy world. Heck, I never even was in Arizona in the first place. The benefits of Bush Administration's wiretapped records on Americans through foreign contacts (or guest workers, whatever that may be) and all that in my head.
"Well, it wasn't threesome. There were three. First one, hard of hearing Spanish left the scene. Both of them, second and third ones, are bisexual."
".... aren't they Spanish, if my source is right...?"
He took a moment in thought. "The hard of hearing... I think American or Spanish, I'm not sure."
I waited.
"Second one is definitely Spanish. Third one looks Mexican... or American. No, American..."
Then he was quick into thinking on his pinky finger, apparently confused with ring finger. Last one he was confused with.
"No, they weren't transvestites."
"Technology those days, you can't tell a transvestite from women," I pointed out. Suddenly, I thought it was a while since I'd see him. He really didn't know, I realized. I feel sorry for a deaf guy to be tricked into such a bad scene.
"Anyway, no, I didn't have threesome. I didn't feel comfortable because they are lesbians, so I did second one then third one afterwards," he said.
I pointed out deliberately. "Think careful. Both of them are Spanish, no?"
He was suddenly in change of mood swing. "No, no. If I did have sex with transvestites, I would kill myself," he panicked at the knowledge that I'd lent him.
I was quick to move and shut my fat mouth as usual. "No, never mind. Drop it. I lied," I said.
"You were fooling around, weren't you? You were scaring me," he laughed. "I should have known."
"I said so because you said you wanted to kill yourself if you did,"
"You're playing with my head."
"I'm not going to say a word about it," I said. I knew how suicidal he can be. Sometimes it is impossible to straighten up and do one of those straight talks, because it hurts people. Sometimes, truth hurts. I drank too slowly for almost nine hours, that I had 11 or 12 cans or so.
After we talked about other subjects, a moment before he left to home: he was still trying to figure out who the third or the fourth one was. I was thinking, perhaps he is in a state of denial... or he tried to suppress the news far behind in his head.
And so I can't sleep as of 5:33 A.M.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
On Individualism in 21st Century American Progressive
Death of Individualism? (Worst Scenario: Individualism vs. Non-individualism)
So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.
The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.
During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.
The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.
The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.
Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?
However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.
The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.
This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?
So. A margin of error that resulted in the summer of Beijing Olympics, 2008. Perhaps it should have never happened again. There is, however, a problem on individualism. It may sound like a communist problem, and that is not so. It is more of cyber-community, otherwise known as subcommittee, problem that is being seen in Western countries. An obvious problem is that it's not whether if we know we don't know if it is 2009 or 2351 (according to a Japanese computer scientist link that was sent to me from Japan). It's about whether if individualism works in the post 9/11 America.
The problem has more to do with a war between individualism and non-individualism, which is aided by pre-programmed individualism. There are many paths into a one road future. The divisive computational software has been divided further and further apart. For example, such cyberrevolution has been brought on the face of Iranian election (although that was a result of specific document that has been leaked in the open-source community two months before). The problem is that ciphered facebook is an international on-line.
During 1980s, it used to be a one-road problem. Reagan solved that with a new Intel operation affiliation on Soviet with a steal of technology, which eventually deciphered and broken into former Soviet satellites. During early 1990s, an enterprise of bio-informatics institute software broke out in Japan, and so animation developed rapidly.
The problem is, thus, exponential in 21st century. While I do not agree that there won't be another Reagan, he is still right about one thing: government is the problem. When I think about government, I think about how softwares have corrupted government so much in early 21st century.
The problem itself is IT technology. Pre-programmed individuals, whether if it be clones, face transplant, sex change, or cubic vaccine-engineering that configured DNA in babies, are visible during 1990s and 2000s as a result of political change in scientific community from the 1980s. Individuals are, naturally, the leading members of every nation. Non-individualism, largely a Socialist incentives, are increasingly being misunderstood by people. These involve military secrets and technological advancements that will be researched by two large corporations. Enterprise community is trapped in the between; its operating systems are being divided into different versions at a rapid rate under an anonymous system. These are underground communities, but I prefer not to mention them.
Did string theory fail, or did it underwent a multidimensional that has only one platform? Is that the only reason why we are still alive? Such a wonder world of the Large Hadron Collider particle project. The main issue that concerns me is that, as individuals getting diffused and differentialized, pre-programmed individuals getting discretely discredited, and non-individuals getting centralized, through many technological changes in operating systems from every six months to three years out of a package. As that mass growth of speculation occur, satellites would eventually be formed under some kind of control by political perpetrators. Does that mean, therefore, system will eventually fail? Or will two corporations hold their buttons and documents over people's lives (for instance, former Soviet Union) through transparent "human" timeline?
However, as political perpetrator practices grow over the period of 21st century, non-individualism automation may very well come in existence under corporations. When it is eventually the time, string theory no longer applies to any leader of any country; they face with a dilemma in defense. The failure of string theory would result in an uncontrolled nuclear ballistics in satellites. The chaos of enterprise solutions will break down into individualism versus non-individualism.
The problem is that glitch in systems is universal. And there are zillions of glitches to decide what lies ahead on one road in future if humankind is to survive. There used to be a one glitch in previous wars: a marginal invention of camera. There also used to be a glitch: a computational invention during Cold War.
This time, the glitch is a ripple among different hundred or more operating systems in the background noise of experimental and organic DNA butchery. Who controls it: individualism or non-individualism?
An Opinion on Mormonism
A shrewd note from a writer who can't un-think.
What is Mormonism, really? Does it deserve a stand on one of Christian branches? I do not believe so. It is more of semi-Judaic Christian; much like Seven Days Adventist. Only that Mormonism is the worst Judaic-Christian branch of all. Not only did it offer men to selfishly pursue the Old Jewish days (and some Muslims in case) of polygamy, also to rewrite the American history itself under the presumed story of Moses.
It is probably unfair for me to to say that, as some Mormons might say that they are reformed today and more Christian-like. I would like to refute that one. It is one of fastest organization in the world; one that may have to do with the Zionist organization. The original Zionist organization that deal with trafficking people, which are visible from Utah to north into Canada. That began in 19th century; and the Jewish International funds began some forty years after the death of Joseph.
Is there some coincidence in the connection? Possibly very much so. I would hate to associate myself with Jewish or Muslim synagogue; the same goes for a Mormon church. I consider religion as more of Jewish than Christian one, not because of its reaffirmation of Old Testament in North America; also its close association with Zionist organization and international expansion. A Mormon would say, it happened a hundred years ago.
Although I am unsure as whether how the Mormon church receive its own funds from the state of Utah and surrounding areas all the way to north, possibly to Idaho. New church means that the very system of organization would have to be started anew from beginning of 1830s and forth on. Yet after the American Civil War, Zionist organization seemed to be in a parallel growth to Mormonism in the backyard of North America.
I do not consider that enough a transformation of transparency from Judaic associations to Christianity. The perversity of Mormons are two thousands and three decades too late. There was no need to alienate the New World into wars.
I do not intend to be a racist from Lutheran and/or Catholic point of view. I intend try to make a sense out of Mormonism and Zionist movements in a connection to international funds that robbed the monetary system out of German-Russian economies in the first place (although that is debatable on a case of post-WWI treaty as co-signed through the big three). On a second thought, Confederate states seemed to be in the same process during the Civil War period. Slavery trade, of course, is one of reasons. What about the slavery of Mormonism and Zionist movements? Does they count? How did subsidiaries play in the role of Zionist and/or Mormon movements during all those periods from pre-Civil War to post WWI periods? Perhaps I don't need to know. All I know is that I'm thankful that I am not a Mormon.
Of course, there is much more than just a background noise of microwave radiation somewhere out there in the parallel universe of religiosity. This is only an attempt to fit a picture of what happened in the backyard and how sub-histories might have played some roles. It is more of a question on outer shell, rather than the insider shell of history.
A quick derivative note: Mormon? More money, more women, move on? Hmph.
What is Mormonism, really? Does it deserve a stand on one of Christian branches? I do not believe so. It is more of semi-Judaic Christian; much like Seven Days Adventist. Only that Mormonism is the worst Judaic-Christian branch of all. Not only did it offer men to selfishly pursue the Old Jewish days (and some Muslims in case) of polygamy, also to rewrite the American history itself under the presumed story of Moses.
It is probably unfair for me to to say that, as some Mormons might say that they are reformed today and more Christian-like. I would like to refute that one. It is one of fastest organization in the world; one that may have to do with the Zionist organization. The original Zionist organization that deal with trafficking people, which are visible from Utah to north into Canada. That began in 19th century; and the Jewish International funds began some forty years after the death of Joseph.
Is there some coincidence in the connection? Possibly very much so. I would hate to associate myself with Jewish or Muslim synagogue; the same goes for a Mormon church. I consider religion as more of Jewish than Christian one, not because of its reaffirmation of Old Testament in North America; also its close association with Zionist organization and international expansion. A Mormon would say, it happened a hundred years ago.
Although I am unsure as whether how the Mormon church receive its own funds from the state of Utah and surrounding areas all the way to north, possibly to Idaho. New church means that the very system of organization would have to be started anew from beginning of 1830s and forth on. Yet after the American Civil War, Zionist organization seemed to be in a parallel growth to Mormonism in the backyard of North America.
I do not consider that enough a transformation of transparency from Judaic associations to Christianity. The perversity of Mormons are two thousands and three decades too late. There was no need to alienate the New World into wars.
I do not intend to be a racist from Lutheran and/or Catholic point of view. I intend try to make a sense out of Mormonism and Zionist movements in a connection to international funds that robbed the monetary system out of German-Russian economies in the first place (although that is debatable on a case of post-WWI treaty as co-signed through the big three). On a second thought, Confederate states seemed to be in the same process during the Civil War period. Slavery trade, of course, is one of reasons. What about the slavery of Mormonism and Zionist movements? Does they count? How did subsidiaries play in the role of Zionist and/or Mormon movements during all those periods from pre-Civil War to post WWI periods? Perhaps I don't need to know. All I know is that I'm thankful that I am not a Mormon.
Of course, there is much more than just a background noise of microwave radiation somewhere out there in the parallel universe of religiosity. This is only an attempt to fit a picture of what happened in the backyard and how sub-histories might have played some roles. It is more of a question on outer shell, rather than the insider shell of history.
A quick derivative note: Mormon? More money, more women, move on? Hmph.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)